SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Heart Attacks, Cancer and strokes. Preventative approaches

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
DinoNavarre
To: carranza2 who wrote (39340)12/16/2025 8:14:14 AM
From: carranza21 Recommendation   of 39344
 
The Google Ai response on fish oil and atrial fibrillation did not satisfy my quest for more detail so I took it to Grok 4, a much better Ai tool:

Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses indicates a dose-dependent relationship between fish oil supplementation (providing omega-3 fatty acids, primarily EPA and DHA) and the risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF).

Higher doses generally associate with greater risk, while lower doses show minimal or no significant increase.

High-Dose Supplementation (>1 g/day EPA+DHA)

Trials using doses of 1.8–4 g/day (e.g., REDUCE-IT, STRENGTH, OMEMI) report significantly elevated AF risk, with hazard ratios (HR) ranging from 1.35 to 1.69.

Meta-analyses of RCTs confirm this pattern:

• Overall increased AF risk (incidence rate ratio ~1.25–1.37).

• Stronger effect at higher doses (HR 1.49 for >1 g/day vs. HR 1.12 for =1 g/day).

Meta-regression shows a linear dose-response: HR increases by ~1.09–1.11 per additional 1 g/day (over 1–4 g/day range).

Pharmaceutical/high-dose supplementation raises risk by ~50% at 1.8–4 g/day, versus ~12% at ~1 g/day.

Low-Dose Supplementation (=1 g/day)

Trials (e.g., VITAL, ASCEND) find no significant AF risk increase.

Typical over-the-counter fish oil supplements often fall in this range and show lower concern.

Dietary Intake vs. Supplements

Observational data and biomarker studies (e.g., circulating omega-3 levels) often show an inverse association—moderate dietary intake from fish (~650–750 mg/day EPA+DHA) links to reduced AF risk (~11–12% lower).

In the UK Biobank, higher plasma omega-3 levels associated with lower AF incidence, while self-reported fish oil supplement use showed no significant risk after adjustments (likely due to predominantly lower doses).

A proposed mechanism involves vagal tone: moderate omega-3 increases provide protective low-level vagal stimulation, while high doses cause excessive stimulation that promotes AF.

The absolute risk increase from supplementation is generally low, but the dose-dependent pattern is consistent across recent analyses (up to 2025). Individuals considering fish oil—especially at higher doses—should discuss risks with a healthcare provider, particularly if they have cardiovascular risk factors. Dietary sources (e.g., fatty fish) appear safer for omega-3 intake regarding AF risk.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext