SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Young and Older Folk Portfolio

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Mili21
QTI on SI
To: InDivGrowthWeTrust who wrote (23801)12/21/2025 12:17:38 PM
From: jritz02 Recommendations   of 23862
 
Re: RQI Special... A LT Cap Gain certainly reads like it was “earned”.

I probably should have said covered instead of earned. LTG is the tax classification and they had to distribute them to meet their managed distribution policy by selling positions with LTGs, but their nav gain should cover the distribution total. The distribution will come out of nav and that is what causes nav erosion which will happen (see chart below).
That is what concerns me because next year they will have to cover an even higher distribution. CS has been in the game a long time and has done a decent job of not eroding nav but the nav is lower than when they came public. Maybe they feel next year is going to be a good year for RE or like I mentioned previously, maybe they are just raising to attract more people, that has become a trend with many CEFs particularly when they are under attack from activist investors. I don't think that's the case with RQI because their discount is only around 5% but I don't follow it that closely because I don't own it.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext