Skip to Content
FP West: Energy Insider: Go behind the oilpatch's closed doors in our new subscriber-exclusive newsletter. Sign up now >>
Sign In
Subscribe $20 for 1 year
Advertisement 1
Breadcrumb Trail Links
- Home
- Investor
'I think time is running out': How to survive a market bubble — if there is oneThough tech stocks have brought investors big wins for years, some experts see cracks in the sector reminiscent of the dot-com era
Author of the article: By Serah Louis
Published Dec 24, 2025 Last updated 19 hours ago 9 minute read 7 Comments
The concentration of gains in the tech space have sparked disagreement about whether investors are staring down a frothy market or the dawn of a sustainable artificial intelligence era that could drive stocks even higher. Photo by Brice Hall/National Post photo illustration
Article content When it comes to the massive sums that Big Tech companies are spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure and the influence that is having on stock markets, Philip Petursson is of two minds.
Article content On the one hand, the chief investment strategist at IG Wealth Management Inc. is not quite ready to declare it a bubble — at least not the kind on the verge of spectacular collapse. On the other, he thinks it would be “irresponsible” to rule out the possibility.
Article content
Article content
Advertisement 1
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content “The question is: How big is that bubble today, and how much more potential is there before the risk of it bursting, if at all, emerges?” Petursson said.
Article content

Investor Canada's best source for investing news, analysis and insight.
Sign UpBy signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Article content Petursson has staked out some middle ground in a debate that has been hanging over equity markets for much of the past year. Despite trade war uncertainty, U.S. stocks enjoyed their third straight winning year, with the S&P 500 up about 17 per cent and the tech-heavy Nasdaq up about 22 per cent, driving their three-year returns to approximately 79 per cent and 123 per cent, respectively. The persistence of those gains, the lofty valuations they’ve created and the concentration of gains in the tech space have sparked disagreement about whether investors are staring down a frothy market or the dawn of a sustainable artificial intelligence era that could drive stocks even higher. It’s a combination that is making 2026 a particularly difficult year to plan for.
Article content “We are seeing those massive hockey-stick parabolic curves,” said Nicholas Mersch, a portfolio manager at Purpose Investments. “( ChatGPT creator) OpenAI essentially didn’t have a product three years ago, and now they’re on a US$20 billion revenue run rate, so this is really the step function growth that we haven’t seen in a very, very long time.”
Article content
Advertisement 2
Story continues below

scroll to continue
Article content Mersch said that despite the growth, there are valid concerns for investors about the rise of AI and how it is being funded. Morgan Stanley strategists have said they expect tech companies to take on as much as US$1.5 trillion in debt by 2028 to finance the infrastructure such as data centres they will need.
Article content
Read More
-
 2026 will not be the time to swing for the fences as investors
-
 The Federal Reserve’s rate cut was a clear signal to investors
Advertisement 1
Article content “There’s more debt in the ecosystem now,” Mersch said. “The net issuance of debt, on a year-to-date basis, has been the highest out of any most recent history that we’ve seen.”
Article content Circular financing is another concern, where one company, for instance Nvidia Corp., makes an investment in OpenAI and OpenAI then buys Nvidia’s products, potentially creating artificial demand, inflating valuations.
Article content David Rosenberg, founder and president of Rosenberg Research & Associates Inc. is one of those who believes the S&P 500 is in a classic price bubble, one tied to investor behaviour and the reaction to the shift in the technology curve.
Article content “Everybody is in the same trade at the same time and the sentiment is as wild as the valuations are,” Rosenberg said. “Nobody took chips off the table this cycle and diversification became a dirty 15-letter word.”
Advertisement 2
Advertisement
Article content He said that historically bubbles last about 16 months and he thinks this one started in June 2024.
Article content “I think time is running out,” he said. “We’re not in the 10th inning anymore, we’re in the 13th or 14th.”
Article content In December, the Shiller P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of the S&P 500, a metric often used to measure stock market valuation, topped 40, a level it hasn’t reached since the last tech bubble of the late 1990s.
Article content The trailing P/E ratio, which looks at earnings from the past 12 months, is also elevated, at about 27.
Article content But Petursson is quick to point out that the Shiller P/E normalizes the past 10 years of earnings and adjusts it for inflation to today’s price.
Article content “The Shiller P/E skews things in a way that makes them look more expensive than they actually are,” he said, noting that COVID-19 and the subsequent inflation and period of lower earnings that followed was not a normal environment.
Article content Valuations of major AI-involved companies such as Nvidia Corp., Alphabet Inc., Amazon.com Inc., and Microsoft Corp., are also still well below the “highflyers” of the dot-com era, Petursson said.
Article content
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content In March of 2000, Qualcomm was trading at 300 times earnings, Yahoo was at 266, Motorola was at 168 times and Cisco Systems Inc. was at 165. Even Microsoft was trading at 55 times its earnings, Petursson said. In comparison, looking at Magnificent Seven megacap tech stocks today, Nvidia is trading at 45, Apple Inc. at 37, Alphabet at 36 and Microsoft at 34 times earnings.
Article content “The other key difference is that (today’s Big Tech) companies are generating billions in revenue and earnings, and so it’s not that they’re raising money out in the marketplace to spend frivolously on a back-of-the-napkin idea,” Petursson said. “It’s apples to oranges.”
Article content He said earnings even across non-tech sectors have been positive. “We are in an economic upcycle, and companies are benefiting as a result of it, whether they’re a technology company or consumer discretionary company.”
Article content Carol Schleif, chief market strategist at Bank of Montreal (BMO) Private Wealth, also does not think the current situation is a bubble. She said another sign to look at is how discerning investors are.
Article content “When a bubble is bursting or about to burst … either everybody buys everything and pushes (the market) up, or everybody sells everything and pushes it down,” she said. “You don’t get any discernment.”
Article content
Advertisement 4
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content Right now, there is divergence, she said. For instance, when five of the Magnificent Seven companies released their earnings last quarter, some of their stocks went down while others went up.
Article content It’s also important to track how high-risk the stocks in question are. And this concerns financial experts on both sides of the border.
Article content While Mersch said it is difficult to say whether the market is in bubble territory, some of the more speculative names in the AI space, such as so-called “neoclouds” like CoreWeave Inc., which offer AI-optimized, GPU-backed servers, could be. “Some valuations look relatively sane, but there are pockets that are definitely frothy,” he said.
Article content Nikola Gradojevic, professor and Fidelity Chair in Finance at the University of Guelph, said he has concerns about the proliferation of AI startups within Canada as well.
Article content “It is partially a bubble,” Gradojevic said, adding that it is unclear how many of these startups will ultimately be successful. “There’s too much hype and not much delivered in terms of profitability and innovation.”
Article content Still, he foresees a correction occurring at some point. “All these companies cannot attract capital forever if they’re not producing anything,” he said.
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
Article content Given investor psychology, a market bubble, no matter what sector it is concentrated around, has the potential to affect all investors if it bursts.
Article content “Often we’re making financial decisions based on gut feelings or emotions or even social forces,” said Lisa Kramer, a professor of finance at the University of Toronto. “You can also have people behaving impulsively when markets start moving quickly.”
Article content For example, Kramer said, during the 2007 U.S. housing market bubble, which triggered the 2008 stock market crash, many retirees liquidated their holdings after a third or more of their portfolios vanished overnight.
Article content “When things rebounded, they tried to get back in, but of course, they were buying back in at higher prices,” she said. “It’s hard to overcome those kinds of emotions.”
Article content Former International Monetary Fund first deputy managing director Gita Gopinath warned in October that an equity market correction of the same magnitude as the dot-com bubble could erase US$20 trillion in wealth for U.S. households.
Article content But the fallout might not be so bad for Canadian investors whose portfolios are more skewed toward domestic investments and less exposed to the tech sector, wrote Royce Mendes, managing director and head of macro strategy at Desjardins Group, in a commentary that same month.
Article content
Advertisement 5
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content “This lower exposure to tech and equities means Canadian households haven’t fully participated in the recent bull market — but it also means they’re less vulnerable to a correction,” Mendes wrote.
Article content While most experts say it is impossible to time a stock market crash, there are strategies investors can consider to mitigate potential losses in a downturn.
Article content Rosenberg said investors need to diversify their portfolios and dial down their degree of risk.
Article content “I’d be raising cash, and I’d be moving into the more defensive areas of the stock market, whether that’s utilities, the pipelines, consumer staples or health care,” he said. “(They) still might go down in a bear market, but you won’t get crushed.”
Article content Rosenberg also suggested investing outside of the U.S., especially in Asia, which he said is the least connected to the American stock market. He recommended the U.K. Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 100 index as well.
Article content “Right now, the two markets that look the best to me globally are Treasuries and U.K. gilts — because those are two central banks that will still be cutting interest rates — and precious metals.
Article content
Advertisement 6
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content While Petursson said volatility can spread widely in the immediate aftermath a bubble, diversification should pay off in the longer term.
Article content The TSX could be a good hedge against a hypothetical AI bubble, Petursson said, given that Canadian stocks are less exposed to AI compared with the U.S. He said IG Wealth has a base-case expectation of return for the S&P/TSX composite of approximately nine per cent (a target of 34,500), while their base case for the S&P 500 index is about five per cent (a 7,200 target).
Article content The Materials (gold) and energy sectors have shown lower correlations historically to tech, he said, while Canadian banks are another attractive investment as they’re less sensitive to AI.
Article content Schleif said BMO is predicting fixed-income markets will remain steady, especially since it appears most central banks have finished lowering interest rates, so fixed income investments such as bonds could provide some stability in investor portfolios in the case of any turbulence.
Article content If you can’t see yourself parting with your current portfolio, Rosenberg said you can consider selling call options against your holdings to provide yourself with some insurance.
Advertisement 4
Story continues below
Article content “The one thing that I found in the past, when the bubble bursts, you want to be long-value, short-growth,” he said. These “pair trades” could include taking a long position with the Dow Jones Industrial Average and short with the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite, for example.
Article content Younger investors have time on their side and do not need to de-risk their portfolios as much, Rosenberg said, as long as they can stomach the volatility.
Article content Petursson said a longer time horizon doesn’t mean younger investors should go all in on equities without any capital to buy into a potential market dip. He suggested a more balanced distribution, such as 70 per cent in equities and 30 per cent in fixed income.
Article content Rosenberg has more concerns about baby boomer investors, who could be disproportionately impacted by a market bubble now compared with the previous dot-com crash.
Article content “In 2000, the median age (of the baby boomers) was 45 not 70, so time was on their side to make up for the losses,” he said. “Time is not on their side this time around.”
Article content Overall, Petursson said he feels positively about next year’s investment outlook, due to strong earnings growth.
Article content
Advertisement 7
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content “Both Canadian and U.S. economies have surprised to the upside, meaning they’ve done better than expected, and this has led to a better expectation for 2026 than what we may have had, say, six or nine months ago,” he said.
Article content Trying to invest around the notion of a bubble is another form of timing the market, Petursson warned.
Article content “More money has been lost trying to predict the top of the market than at any other time,” he said. “The best approach is to just continue to invest periodically … because the corrections are unpredictable.”
Article content He thinks people are overly concerned about bubbles, suggesting the “red zone” of AI spend could still be years away. He predicted AI bubble concerns are more likely to materialize in the back half of 2026 or early 2027, if they do.
Article content Kramer, too, warned against the risk of becoming uninvested.
Article content “Then you’re certain not to get the upside,” she said. “ Inflation has popped up in recent years, and if you’re just sitting on cash in an era when there’s inflation, then your spending power is being eroded.”
Article content Regardless, practicing “portfolio hygiene,” or paying attention to what you own, is important, Schleif said.
Article content “The last thing you want to do is be sitting in the front seat of the rollercoaster, hanging on for dear life.”
Article content • Email: slouis@postmedia.com
Article content
Share this article in your social network
How long does it take to learn a language? Find out nowMost people think it takes a lifetime to speak a new language. But with Babbel, you can start speaking in just 3 weeks.Babbel| Sponsored
Philip Cross: The sad story of Justin Trudeau’s 'youthful idiots'Young voters helped give Trudeau a majority in 2015. The policy decade that followed was not good for them, as many now realizeFinancial Post
Commercial Property Marketing That Actually WorksLoopNet influenced billions of dollars in CRE transactions in 2024. Explore the top inked leases and deals in your market.LoopNet| Sponsored
Book Portugal at 2025 pricesExoticca| Sponsored
Put your commercial listing in front of 13 million searchersMove your commercial property off the market fast. Reach the right audience at the right time in the right place.LoopNet| Sponsored
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Create an Account Sign in
Join the Conversation
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.
Send Funds to Global Suppliers FastRemitly| Sponsored
Book Peru at 2025 pricesExoticca| Sponsored
Tasha Kheiriddin: The Conservatives who could replace Pierre PoilievreSpeculation abounds over who is waiting to take over the partyFinancial Post
MOST POPULAR
MacKenzie Scott has given $26B to nonprofits since 2019. Here's what she supported in 2025Financial Post
Tilos, the waste-free, energy-independent islandSustainability For All | ACCIONA| Sponsored
Subscribe $20 for 1 year

Categories
Secondary Links
Manage Account
Advertise
Classified
Sales
Postmedia Network
?
Follow us
Give us some feedback!
365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4
© 2025 Financial Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.
Bottom links Privacy Policy Terms of Use Copyright Digital Ad Registry FAQ Sitemap Contact us
 |