SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas M. who wrote (359663)1/9/2026 7:55:39 PM
From: Mongo21164 Recommendations

Recommended By
bustersmith
CentralParkRanger
ralfph
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (3) of 359913
 
Listen up you goofy ass, slack jaw, mouth breathing, MAGA bootlickers.

There is no federal crime called “failure to comply with an ICE agent’s verbal command.”

ICE agents aren’t traffic cops. They’re not uniformed officers with lights and sirens pulling you over. They rolled up in a gray pickup truck on a residential street. The legal framework for “lawful orders” that citizens must obey is actually pretty narrow - and it typically requires the officer to have lawful authority over you specifically in that moment.

There is no law that says Renee Nicole Good needed to follow any orders she was given.

She was not the target of the operation.

Theoretically - we don’t live in a place where we answer to law enforcement at their will. There has to be a reason for them to detain you. And it can’t just be vibes!

She was a bystander. A citizen. Sitting in her car on a public street. ICE had no warrant for her. No probable cause to detain her. No legal authority to order her to do anything.

They rolled up and tried to drag her out of her car - and when she attempted to drive out of the way - an ICE agent pulled out his gun - for no other reason than intimidation - and put himself in front of her vehicle. And then shot her in the face.

That’s not legal - you fucking morons.

ICE can’t break the law and then act like she was the one being aggressive.

On shooting into vehicles specifically:

Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara said that “in any professional law enforcement agency in the country… most law enforcement agencies in the country have trained very intensely to try and minimize the risk” of using deadly force against someone in a vehicle who’s not armed.

The reason departments have moved away from shooting at moving vehicles is because the legal standard for deadly force is imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm - and courts have increasingly found that “the car moved in my direction” doesn’t automatically meet that bar, especially when the officer can step aside.

The legal question isn’t whether she complied with their unlawful orders - it’s whether a reasonable officer would have believed deadly force was necessary.

“She didn’t comply” isn’t a legal defense for homicide. It’s a political narrative - and some of you morons are buying it hook, line and sinker…

You fucking idiots.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext