SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (1582634)1/10/2026 5:52:50 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Read Replies (4) of 1585834
 
Um, look. At the time he fired upon her, he was in no danger. You can clearly see that he is making an effort to get close to make his shots, even leaning over the fender to shoot through the windshield. Whether or not she actually contacted him with her vehicle isn't really relevant, by the time he had starting firing there was no danger.

So it was an execution.

It doesn't matter if she was a radical of any stripe. It doesn't matter if she was a drug or child abuser. It doesn't even matter if she had a backpack nuke in the trunk. The shooter had no way to know any of that. All he knew is she pissed him off and had to die. His comment to her after he shot her pretty much establishes his motive.

The mental gymnastics you are going through to justify the known facts are worthy of gold at the Olympics.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News