SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (1582638)1/11/2026 2:00:40 AM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (3) of 1585832
 
At the time he fired upon her, he was in no danger.
The question, under the 4th Amendment as comprehended under the law, is the "reasonableness" under the 4th Amendment, not the officer's fear or the actual threat to him. Could have reasonably felt threatened? I think he could: IF she turned away at the last moment yet never even touched him with the car, it is reasonable for him to have believed his life was in danger or that he might in some way have been injured.

In that state you and I both know that a jury will convict any cop who shoots anyone for any reason.

I'm sorry the woman died but she caused it herself by her own actions.

I hope, at least, some of these leftist fools will come to understand there is a danger in attacking the cops in any way, even if it seems minor to the offender.

As so many have said (even if glibly in some cases), she was killed by her own FAFO.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News