| | | You need to find another AI. That one is crap.
My tone? It objects to my tone?
As to being inflammatory, I guess facts and reality are inflammatory to MAGAts.
Indigenous populations had no prior exposure or immunity
Neither will your enclave. It was eradicated and people stopped vaccinating, remember? And where would they get the vaccines?
Your measles free enclave would have, at best, the immunity that was common pre-vaccines. A general rule of thumb used to be one person would infect a dozen or so others over the course of the infection. I'd try to explain exponential growth to you, but it is pretty clear that is way above your degree of understanding. Suffice it to say that despite having access to a public health infrastructure, one that had centuries of continuous experience with dealing with measles outbreaks it still could run rampart and people were crippled and/or killed. Experience your enclave would no longer have, so it likely will be worse.
I wasn't aware that AIs were so prone to sophistry in addition to making shit up.
The rest of your post wallows in it. For one, it pretty much assume a population that has at least some form of herd immunity with its talk of immunity gaps. You have the whole population in the gap, being unvaccinated and all. Not to mention, what sounds very much like a surveillance state with the assumed degree of monitoring.
The conclusion is rich, though...
Internal contradiction The post argues:
- Humans move freely
Yep, I did post that.
- Therefore vaccination is dangerous
Nope. That is made up bullshit. I never posted that.
- But also claims eradication requires not vaccinating
More bullshit. Piled higher and deeper. I never made that claim, either.
That contradicts how eradication actually happens (vaccination first, cessation last).
Which I actually stated.
Problem: The conclusion doesn’t follow the premises.
Only because the AI made shit up.
You need to work on your prompts. You managed to confuse the AI. Not that is particularly difficult, but...
It isn't an ad hominem attack when it is true. You clearly don't understand the subject, nor how AI does things so you didn't see that it was producing nonsense. So you fed it garbage, got garbage out and didn't even understand things well enough to see that it happened so you proudly posted it as a rebuttal. |
|
