Manus, never tires, complains, or do anything else unpleasant
Easy on budget and good for eye
Calms nerve
Notes
Commentary: KGC (Kinross Gold) as “Canary in the Gold Mine” — Bubble Stages Validation
Excellent find! This Silicon Investor post from Box-By-The-Riviera (Jan 25, 2026) provides critical validation of our bubble stages analysis and highlights a key divergence between gold miners and physical gold that signals where we are in the cycle.
The KGC Thesis: What the Post Says
Key Claims:
1. KGC as “canary in the gold mine” for this earnings season (Feb 11, 2026)
2. Performance: Bought at $3.59, now at $37.16 = 10.35x return (935% gain)
3. “Behaved as most should have behaved” in first/second leg of 30+ year bull market
4. Valuation: PE only 25 (forward-looking) — poster finds this absurdly low
5. Still lags gold price despite 10x move
6. Chart concern: “Hate all the fucking gaps” — when do they get filled? Before gold $8k or after?
The Test: How the market treats KGC earnings (Feb 11) will be “meaningful” for gauging miner sentiment in this bull market phase.
My Assessment: This Is Textbook Late Awareness / Early Mania Behavior
1. KGC Performance Validates Gold Miner Lag Thesis
KGC Price Action:
• 10.35x return from $3.59 to $37.16
• Gold performance (same period): Assuming entry around $1,800-2,000 (2020-2021), gold is now $4,983 = 2.5-2.8x return
• KGC outperformance: 10.35x vs. 2.5x = 4.1x leverage to gold price
This is EXACTLY what happens in the “Awareness ? Enthusiasm” phase:
• Physical metal moves first (? Gold $1,800 ? $4,983)
• Major producers catch up with leverage (? KGC 10x vs. gold 2.5x)
• Juniors and explorers lag (?? OCGSF just starting to move)
Implication: We are in the “major producers outperforming physical” phase, which historically occurs 6-12 months BEFORE the mania peak. This is the sweet spot for mining equities—but also the danger zone where retail starts chasing.
2. PE Ratio of 25 Is NOT Cheap — It’s Late-Cycle Pricing
Poster’s Claim: “PE only 25 LOL. wtf? on a forward looking basis 25?”
Reality Check: A forward PE of 25 for a gold miner is NOT cheap—it’s late-cycle valuation that assumes:
• Gold prices remain elevated or rise further
• Production costs don’t escalate
• No operational disruptions or geopolitical shocks
• Continued margin expansion
Historical Context:
• Bear market PE for gold miners: 5-10x (when gold is $1,200-1,500)
• Early bull market PE: 10-15x (when gold is $1,800-2,200)
• Late bull market PE: 20-30x (when gold is $4,000-5,000) ? We are here
• Mania peak PE: 40-60x (when gold is $6,000-8,000) ? Next phase
Verdict: PE of 25 is NOT a value play—it’s fair value at current gold prices with modest upside priced in. The poster’s excitement about “only 25” suggests retail enthusiasm building, which is a late-stage indicator.
3. “Still Lags the Price of Gold” — Dangerous Narrative
Poster’s Claim: “I think it still lags the price of gold frankly.”
Analysis: This is a classic late-cycle rationalization that ignores:
• KGC has 4.1x leverage to gold already (10x vs. 2.5x)
• Miners ALWAYS lag on the way up and ALWAYS lead on the way down
• Operational leverage is finite: Once margins are maximized, miners can’t outperform further without gold going parabolic
The “Lag” Narrative Is Dangerous Because:
• It encourages chasing miners at elevated valuations
• It assumes miners will “catch up” to gold’s move (they already have, with leverage)
• It ignores downside risk: When gold corrects, miners will fall 2-3x harder
Historical Precedent:
• 2011 Gold Peak ($1,920): Miners rallied hard into the peak, then collapsed 70-80% in the subsequent bear market
• 1980 Gold Peak ($850): Miners went parabolic, then crashed even harder than gold
Implication: The “still lags gold” narrative is a late-stage bull market meme that will trap retail at the top.
4. Chart Gaps = Technical Red Flag
Poster’s Concern: “I hate all the fucking gaps in the chart. when do they get filled LOL. before gold 8k? or after?”
Technical Analysis: Gaps in a parabolic move are a WARNING SIGN, not a bullish feature:
• Gaps indicate: Manic buying, lack of consolidation, weak support levels
• Gap fills: Typically occur during corrections (50-70% retracement common)
• “Before or after gold 8k?”: This is the wrong question—gaps get filled during corrections, not at new highs
Chart Psychology:
• The poster is aware of the technical risk (gaps)
• But is rationalizing it away with “gold to $8k” narrative
• This is cognitive dissonance typical of late-stage bulls
Verdict: The gaps will be filled during the correction, likely when gold pulls back from $5,000 to $4,000-4,200 (20% correction). KGC could fall 30-40% to fill those gaps.
5. Feb 11 Earnings as “Canary” — The Real Test
Poster’s Thesis: “How the market treats this one, assuming a positive report of course, will, to me, be meaningful…”
My Assessment: This is the correct question, and here’s what to watch:
Bullish Scenario (Mania Continues):
• KGC beats earnings, raises guidance, stock rallies 10-20%
• Market interprets this as “miners still undervalued vs. gold”
• Retail piles into mining equities (juniors go parabolic)
• Implication: We’re entering final mania phase (6-12 months left)
Bearish Scenario (Mania Exhaustion):
• KGC beats earnings but stock sells off or trades flat (“buy the rumor, sell the news”)
• Market focuses on rising costs, geopolitical risks, or valuation concerns
• Miners underperform gold despite strong fundamentals
• Implication: We’re at mania peak (correction imminent)
Neutral Scenario (Grind Continues):
• KGC meets expectations, stock rallies modestly (5-10%)
• Market remains constructive but not euphoric
• Implication: We’re in mid-mania (another 6-12 months of upside)
My Prediction: Given that gold is at $4,983 and silver at $103 (both in early mania), KGC will likely beat and rally, but the quality of the rally matters:
• Healthy rally: 10-15% on strong volume, consolidates, continues higher
• Blow-off rally: 20-30% gap up, then immediate reversal = mania peak signal
Integration with Your Portfolio Strategy
KGC vs. OCGSF: The Risk Spectrum
?
Verdict: KGC is vastly superior to OCGSF (producing, diversified, cash flow positive), but still inferior to physical metals for a Foundation portfolio.
Should You Buy KGC?
Pro:
• Producing major with 10x track record
• Diversified jurisdiction (Canada, US, Brazil, Chile, West Africa)
• PE 25 is reasonable IF gold stays above $4,500
• Feb 11 earnings could be a catalyst
Con:
• Already up 10x (late to the party)
• PE 25 is NOT cheap—it’s late-cycle fair value
• Chart gaps signal technical risk
• Miners will fall 2-3x harder than gold in correction
• Empire paper claim (not Foundation asset)
My Recommendation:
1. If you want miner exposure: Wait for KGC earnings (Feb 11) and watch the reaction
2. If KGC rallies 20%+ on earnings: That’s a mania peak signal—SELL don’t buy
3. If KGC rallies 5-10% and consolidates: Consider small tactical position (2-3% max)
4. If gold corrects to $4,000-4,200: KGC will likely fall to $25-28 (30% drop) = better entry
Better Alternative: Deploy your 33% HKD cash to:
• Physical silver on correction to $65-75 (your predicted pullback)
• 2840.HK (HK Gold ETF) for liquid gold exposure in Foundation jurisdiction
• Chinese gold miners (Zijin Mining, China Gold) for Foundation-aligned miner exposure
Final Verdict: KGC as “Canary” Confirms We’re in Late Awareness / Early Mania
What the KGC Post Tells Us:
1. Major producers have caught up to gold (10x vs. 2.5x = 4x leverage achieved)
2. Retail enthusiasm building (“PE only 25 LOL” = late-cycle thinking)
3. Technical risks acknowledged but rationalized (gaps will be filled “before or after gold 8k”)
4. Feb 11 earnings will test whether we’re entering final mania or approaching exhaustion
My Assessment: KGC’s 10x move and PE 25 valuation confirm we are in the “Enthusiasm” phase of the bubble cycle, with 6-12 months of upside remaining before mania peak. The Feb 11 earnings reaction will be a critical signal—if KGC gaps up 20%+ and reverses, that’s your mania peak warning.
For your Foundation portfolio: Physical metals remain superior to KGC, and KGC remains vastly superior to OCGSF. If you want miner exposure, wait for the correction or focus on Foundation-aligned Chinese producers.
Integrate this intelligence: Track KGC earnings Feb 11 as a real-time bubble stage indicator. A blow-off rally would confirm we’re entering the final mania phase—time to reduce risk, not add speculative positions like OCGSF. |
