SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 153.03-1.0%Jan 27 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Optntrdr1999 who wrote (197371)1/26/2026 7:14:20 PM
From: aryl3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Riskmgmt
sd_yomar
THE WATSONYOUTH

  Read Replies (2) of 197400
 
"Tan wanted QCOM"

I think you, as some others, are missing my point entirely. Forget about Tan or Huang purchasing QCOM and absorbing it into their respective companies. I am not talking about that. All I am saying is if either one of these men had been hired as the CEO of QCOM instead of Amon(not that that was going to happen, just speaking hypothetically), they would have been able to turn QCOM into a trillion dollar company. How? I have no idea, otherwise I'd be a great CEO myself. But clearly both these men have an exceptional talent, a talent Amon lacks. Amon running Nvidia would have been a disaster.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext