Sam-
<<Now that explains it. Now I understand why REFR told me over the phone that products will not be ready for a few years in mid 90's when you posted otherwise.>>
I quoted what SAXE said. Nothing else. And I never said this was an independent source, you did.
The disclaimer you printed does not appear on the newsletter. The reason I think it was paid for by the company is, at the end of the newsletter, it says to call the THEM if you want information about the REFR. Again, there is nothing wrong with that, just a statement of fact.
<<You sound like a bitter investor who got caught up in your own projections and probably got greedy buying as REFR was going up to 16 and then got hammered forever looking for revenge.>>
I won't, for the 10,000th time, print when I have been in and out of this stock. But I have been both, and have made money.
And I know a lot more than you think. I don't post half of what I should because I know how it will be treated. You don't care, you love the company. Well, how much research have you done on possible competition? In the past few days I've seen some pretty wild posts about the zillions people are going to make.
Do yourself a favor before you post again. Go do a web search on PDLC. Then look at all the research going on in that area, which is in direct competition with SPDs. Look at who is doing the research, Bell-Labs, Kent State, Sharp, and the list goes on. Look at the products these companies say they can use PDLCs for. Seen that before, looks like the same as REFR. And some of their products are already on the market.
Don't start unless you have lots of time. The LCI information will take 1/2 hour in itself, just for a quick run over. Then do a search on SPD (use a term like Light Valve with SPD unless you want learn all about the German Social Democratic Party). Most of what you will find will come from one source.
I'll give you all what you want, I'll be out of town for the next few days. Have fun.
Rick |
