Leo, this just gets better and better. let's see how many lies you added to your web in your latest attempt at a response. You were off to such a great start with those quick witted "zingers" you threw at me like "you need help," "understand yet," and "think hard." How do you think them up so fast? Then you even said I Blustered! Ouch - that one really hurt! And all without the vulgarities usually associated with those of low intelligence. How do you do it! As for confusing an agenda with lying, I suggest you look up those words in the dictionary, or I can save you the trouble. An agenda is a list of things to be done, whereas a lie is a false statement or a piece of information deliberately presented as being true, or a falsehood - presenting information with the intention of deceiving. Hopefully you now know the difference between the two - yes, I had an agenda, but NO, I didn't lie or present a falsehood of any sort. Now for a list of your latest lies:
1. I never, ever said you bought after the CC, only that you posted positive after the 10Q CC (post #'s 9465 where I said you posted positive after the 10Q CC, and # 6390 on the S3 thread where you actually did post positive after the 10Q CC). A classic example of how you try and manipulate the truth and misrepresent what I actually said in a pathetic attempt to find an advantage. But the words speak for themselves, right there before our very eyes, and in the public archives!
2. The stock was on the way down for several weeks before the CC, when you posted nothing but positive (any and all of your posts from the 5400's to the low 6,000's will do here)- from 15 or so to the 9's, again, just as I said, and just as I've already proved. You said you added 20% to your S3 position on Oct 17, just four days before you sold. Post #'s 6160 and 9506 will prove this point (again).
3. You said I failed to prove my uncontrolled, emotional and unfounded claims, but I've already proved them, Leo, that's what my posts have been based on. Can't you read?? They are neither unfounded nor wild, they are backed up by your own words and the exact dates and numbers of your posts that prove them. There is certainly nothing emotional about the use of hard, cold facts.
4. Again, I've already searched the public archives - that's what I've been using to prove that you are a liar. This is pretty simple stuff here, Leo...connect the dots, re-read my posts over and over again, just like you had to do with S3's 10Q CC, when you finally sold after listening to it 10 times, just like the public archives tell us - post # 6458
5. TXT was at 59 1/4 when you posted on the TXT board #8 on Oct 27, and is now 74 9/16 , which is an increase of 25 (%, when you claimed just yesterday that it was a 30% increase. More lies based on your own words, backed up by the public record and tied in a neat, little shiny bow.
Let's see now, that's five more lies in just the last post!! And you think I have low intelligence - heck, I can comprehend your posts after the first reading!! Perhaps the saddest and most ironic part of all of this that you somehow think you are winning in this little debate we've had over the past few days. That may be hard on your battered and bruised ego, but they are, and remain the hard, cold, unemotional facts. Proven by your very own words and shining brightly in the public forum for all to see. Your serve!
Honest, unemotional and not the least bit vulgar, Sam |
