SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Profits who wrote (29053)2/27/1998 1:05:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) of 1573982
 
Profits - Re: " I would think that adding IBM as a foundry wouldn't be a surprise to you."

Why didn't AMD do this last year? Last year Intel had a huge advantage in wafer fabs over AMD.

Now, AMD will have to pay IBM's profits to IBM before they ever get a dime selling these K6's to their own customers.

If AMD's customers didn't think AMD was a viable manufacturer of x86 CPUs before, this deal sure tells them they were wrong!

And you can bet Intel's sales force will be making sure all Tier 1 and Tier 2 PC manufacturers know this fact - and the fact that any K6 bought from AMD helps IBM - a competitor to these PC manufacturers.

If Intel drives down pricing enough, AMD may end up losing more money on this deal - as opposed to MAKING money.

Last year, AMD didn't think Intel would drive down CPU pricing. Last year AMD found out they were wrong.

This year may be no different.

Paul
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News