SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Shorting stocks: Broken stocks - Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: drakes353 who wrote (900)2/28/1998 5:41:00 PM
From: taxikid  Read Replies (1) of 2506
 
you are ref. to subordinated debentures. I was ref. to a specific
"floorless" debenture.. which looks to me like an extremely safe "junk bond".
sometimes companies do it because they are in dire need, sometimes they do it and like EA was referenced to in a previous post, that co officers had done this offshore thing, it looks fishy, but would you not be interested in being on the buy side(of the bonds)?
Do not ASSUME that all circumstances are the same... while this stock has a little room to fall the outstnding float is small and an increased short position could push this stock higher, especially since a three day spike to $10 would margin out most shorts.
the RISK vs REWARD is what i was discussing.
lotsa risk, what do you think the reward is on a stock that the bondholders will snatch up @ 1.50-$2.. that tells you there is a bottom on this short..
so you risk "limitless"{let's be reasonable- let's say the cap on a heavy squeeze and combined "good news" pr blitz is $15)
you risk $9 to maybe@ best get back $4. The odds are stacked against you.
especially if a pump and dump broker sees the short position go up..
taxi~
BTW i could go on and on about s3 regulations and BONDS, but i think the point would only be that i waste my breath explaining them to you.
glad you can jump on the bandwagon and assume all junk bonds signify the death of the company.
I guess there would be no innovative small companies, if your assumption is correct.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext