Ok, guys, why not a web site where the database consists of the players, the raw data for each player would be FACTS, especially documented, clear cut WRONG calls (dates, times, verbatim trackable quotes) as well as "ratings" made by folks who go to the site to express opinions about players. This is the modified "analyst market" concept. All market participants get to assign ratings to analyst of a totally subjective nature, BUT they also have to leave their NAME, ID etc. In other words let's have accountability at all levels, honestly available. We could also develop a pool to see who gets bribed first!
LOL,
Doug |
