It appeared you were saying the Market was reacting favorably because Riley was bullish on LTGL, I disagreed, I feel it a reaction to the Radio Shack & Pep Boys agreements.
Rephrased that way, I don't have a problem with it.
Here is an excerpt from the message to which I was replying, though.
There is no hyping here, just you slamming Riley for being bullish on LTGL.
Riley was hyping it in #daytraders, not here. I didn't slam him. I simply said he was hyping it there. Unlike some folks, I don't attach a strongly negative connotation to the word "hype" in the context of the #daytraders channel, so don't read "negative" between those lines.
I also said that his hype was not responsible for the majority of the climb, and stated why I thought that.
Read, comprehend, then argue if there's a real problem with the statements.
I must say, though, that the presence of you, Riley, and Garrett in this one means I'd better DD quite a bit more before plunking down any hard-earned Monday morning.
Your collective track record, and tendency toward unsavory behaviour in public stock forums, is a bearish indicator. |
