FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL)

FTEL 3.280

-7.5%

Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Martin P. Smith who wrote (29181)	3/2/1998 12:30:00 PM
From: Pat Garaffa	Read Replies (1) of 41046

Martin: Thanks for the response but I'm still unclear. This came from FTEL's site under the specifications for the Tempest: >>Each voice port is a Central Office, FXS appearance and has built in Ringer for a Modem, Telephone or PBX, or FXO (Foreign Exchange Office) appearance to receive a telco trunk line interface. The Analog Voice Cards are MVIP Compliant.<< I still think 1 T1 will accommodate 24 simultaneous conversations - not 12. Otherwise 2 ports, not 1, would be required for a Central Office. Perhaps the system requires in-bound and out-bound ports to be configured differently. But once the call is establish by either party, a complete bidirectional conversation would occur on 1 channel and not 2. That would justify the argument for 12 ports = 12 conversations but I'm fairly confident the Tempest will support 24 simultaneous conversations, regardless of where the call was originated. Again I may be wrong - happens every day! <ggg> Can someone help settle this? - Pat

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next