SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Essential Therapeutics (ETRX) formerly Microcide (MCDE

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: aknahow who wrote (26)3/3/1998 1:03:00 PM
From: Pseudo Biologist  Read Replies (1) of 415
 
George, the non-disclosure of exact royalty percentages is, for good or for bad, standard practice. Still, the current (early 98) info packet from Microcide includes a detailed report from Merrill Lynch (dated Sept 2, 1997) where an 8% number is assumed. This is done across the board, for the J&J, Daiichi, and Pfizer collaborations.

One would think that MCDE, while not officially endorsing these numbers, would not let the analyst make too much of a fool of himself (as per Rick Harmon's comment elsewhere).

I would say this information should reduce the guess range from your 2-25% to, perhaps, 5-15% or even 6-10%. Also, these deals often have "step-up" clauses, whereby sales beyond certain level lead to higher royalty numbers. Say, you get 6% in the first $100 mill, but from then on you get 10%, etc.

PB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext