Crystallex (VSE:KRY) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (VSE:KRY)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: KC Jones who wrote (41)	3/4/1998 12:10:00 PM
From: Bleeker	Read Replies (2) of 60

Crystallex reports false information on its Las Cristinas claims. Investors have been buying shares of Crystallex International Corporation (AMEX Symbol: KRY) believing that a court decision pending in Venezuela can effect the title of the Las Cristinas mining concessions. Specifically, Crystallex claims it has the rights to "Las Cristinas 4 & 6 gold concessions" and that "the Supreme Court of Venezuela is currently considering its application seeking to enforce its ownership rights over" these gold concessions. Both of these statements are false and untrue. These false Crystallex statements have led to widespread reports that a pending Supreme Court decision will force the government to take the concessions away from its current owners and give them to Crystallex. There is no truth to these reports, yet Crystallex has not issued a denial. In fact, we believe that these reports could not exist without management's knowledge and full cooperation. It is these false reports that have caused Crystallex's stock to rise over 250% during the last seven weeks. Crystallex's stock promotion is its only source of funding and is entirely dependent on its fabricated Las Cristinas claim. We believe that Crystallex has purposely disseminated such false and misleading information in order to defraud investors. Crystallex does not and has never had any direct or indirect interest in Las Cristinas. There is no ongoing legal proceeding or pending decision in any court that can result in Crystallex having an interest in Las Cristinas. There has never been a ruling by any court or other authority that can be reasonably interpreted to question ownership of the Las Cristinas concessions. Likewise, there has never been a ruling that created a possibility that Crystallex ever had, or should ha ve had, an interest in the Las Cristinas gold concessions. Information to the contrary is necessarily false and misleading.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next