Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ThirdEye who wrote (9840)	3/4/1998 2:47:00 PM
From: M. Frank Greiffenstein	Read Replies (1) of 13949

Taoman, Yes, LOL, I had a suspicion that Innovative is not in the same class of DLJ or Dain Bosworth. But it is the association with CCD that got my attention. They were rated as the best y2k toolset by some organization, would have to go to my home computer to find that research. Too bad OPSY is not a reporting ocmpany. I would like to know what sorts of options the employees have been given. The capital structure of this company will be important to detemrine before huge $$ is comitted. But I say to myself, IAIC and ACLY had the same beginnings, and they are legitimate reporting companies as we speak. Speaking of ACLY, if revenue ramp up reported in these news releases are accurate, OPSY is blowing ACLY out of the water, producing more in revenue per month now than ACLY did all last quarter. Again, belief and faith that these numbers are correct is all I have to go on here. But the NADA contract and CCD association validates the company in my mind. And CCD people have been resigning to join OPSY. I'll keep you all posted. DocStone

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next