<< Wow! There first telco that evaluates their Gigamux, approves it for deployment! >>
Approved for deployment doesn't equal deployment now does it?
<< As your idol Kramer would say..... WRONG!!!!
I'll make this little bet with you. If Brooks doesn't deploy Osicom's Gigamux into their network within the next 3 months, I will disappear from this thread. If they do deploy, you will disappear >>
Oh, I see. You have gone from touting BFPT deployment of the Gigamux to saying deployment within 3 months. Sounds like your whistling a different tune, David. You and others led people to believe that there were Gigamux's deployed in BFPT's network, INSTALLED, FUNCTIONING and OPERATING RIGHT NOW. That's what deployment means in the tech world David. Trials don't equal deployment, and saying that Gigamux's are deployed for use in a network is different than saying that Gigamux's are deployed for trials. People on this thread and Osicom management are notorious for manipulating language to their advantage. I see right through that crap and the JP Morgan analyst who questioned them hard about the NASA issue revealed just that in the conference call.
<< Interesting to note that Brooks is owned by WCOM, who recently bought MCI and also owns MFS Communications, making WorldCom the 4 largest telco. Now that Brooks has approved the Gigamux, I wonder if that automatically means it is approved by the other sister companies? Something to think about >>
Now that WCOM owns BFPT and CIEN is WCOM's WDM "supplier of choice" where does that leave FIBR? Low margin table scraps if anything at all? |
