Carole,
You certainly have the right to make fun of me with this being a anonymous vehicle of communication. I can assure you this will be my final post on RDOX, because as you say, I must have better things to do with my time. I would only request for you to consider the following:
(1) They do file with the SEC, bless their hearts.
Carole, every company you see listed in the Wall Street Journal, Barron's ,Investor's Business Daily,etc., file with the SEC. What is important is what they file. Have you looked at what RDOX has filed?Look at the filing last November, in which they had to restate their assets from the $5Million they were carrying on the books for the "patent" to an adjusted $1,500, the value of the stock for which they paid for the rights to the patent. Carole, that is $5,000,000 down to $1,500.
(2) You make light of the Add-Vision company in Pacifica, California not having a listed phone number. I find this incredilous that this doesn't bother you in the least, since RDOX issued a press release about this association with ADD-VISION, Inc. Do you not think that this would be a red flag to anyone wanting to loan RDOX money to build a factory. How is a bank going to check their business associates if they don't have a phone number. Don't you think that a reputable bank willl do any DD with RDOX before loaning them money?
(3) On another thread you stated that this was the week for RDOX to announce the big deal. What happened to now make you move the big news to another week. Does tomorrow never come for RDOX.
(4) Carole, just for your information, you can't short RDOX with any reputable brokerage houses. Oh, how I wish I could though!
(5) As for the NASA rumor, please call NASA, they will talk with you and they will tell you that they have no working relationship with RDOX.
Take care Carole, I truly wish that you and the others investing in RDOX make millions of dollars. |
