Somebody better tell Susan, the one who wants to "be Frank":
exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com
There you'll find some very convoluted account of a
South Carolina lawyer named Few who claims Starr
tried to cover up perjured testimony in a case involving
General Motors.
The matter has to do with a GM engineer who wrote a
memo in 1973 about auto safety. In a lawsuit involving
Few, Starr argued that a 1981 document about the
engineer's memo by a lawyer for GM could not be
introduced as evidence because it was protected by
"attorney-client privilege." Starr won the argument by
unanimous decision of the Fourth Circuit Court of
Appeals.
But that was federal court. Now there's another case
against GM in a Florida state court, and Few has used
the occasion to level the absurd accusation that Starr
obstructed justice by making the "attorney-client"
argument in South Carolina.
If that were true, the Fourth Circuit would be a
co-conspirator in the obstruction, since it supported
Starr. This proves Few's charges don't even deserve to
be bird-cage liner. So why was America reading about
it? Because, as The New York Times put it, "President
Clinton's aides today circulated a batch of memos
critical of Mr. Starr's performance as a lawyer ..."
In other words, Few threw some mud at Starr, and
almost instantaneously the White House was faxing the
mud around Washington newsrooms.
And just as the mudslinging against the independent
counsel's office involved not only Starr but his deputies,
other lawyers for Kirkland and Ellis who have nothing
to do with the Whitewater investigation are now getting
unjustly spattered.
Now, who is this guy Few? All you need to know
about him is that he is a trial lawyer.
The most reliable source of funds for the Democratic
Party in the 1990s has been the membership of the
American Trial Lawyers Association. The trial lawyers
need the Democratic party to block much-needed
reforms of the tort system by which injury and damages
are determined.
The Democrats in the White House now need the trial
lawyers to participate in their desperate effort to blow
smoke and create confusion. The trial lawyers pay; the
White House sends it around.
Now, how about the vastness of the left-wing
conspiracy? Watch this space; more to come. Joe
Conason, call Hillary and warn her.
nypostonline.com
Susan had stated "it is not surprising you would attempt to mischaracterize and distort the fact sequence...I refer you to..."
I say that it is hardly shocking that it fails to surprise anyone that Susan has mischaracterized and distorted the fact sequence and then claimed that I did.
Perfect Clintonism. |
