Year 2000 (Y2K) Embedded Systems & Infrastructure Problem Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Year 2000 (Y2K) Embedded Systems & Infrastructure Problem

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Mansfield who wrote (155)	3/7/1998 6:55:00 AM
From: John Mansfield	of 618

'.. GM wants status from all their suppliers' You have some leverage with the senior trading partner if they want the compliance status of the minor partner. For example, GM wants status from all their suppliers, so the suppliers have an avenue to ask for data on GM. -----Original Message----- >From: Dorian Hanzich <dkh@hwcpa.com> >To: "'Year 2000 Mailing List'" <year2000-discuss@year2000.com> >Subject: Confirmation Issues >Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 16:42:49 -0800 > >1. Has anyone tried to quantify the nature and extent of alternate >procedure methodologies that will be "reasonable" in those situations >where Y2K confirmations are not received? >2. Has anyone determined how to create an incentive for a trading >partner to respond when the situation is that the confirm recipient is >the party with the business leverage? i.e., why would they assert an otherwise implicit obligation when it has nothing to gain by doing so? ______________ From: "Richard W. Poole" <rwpoole@email.msn.com> To: <year2000-discuss@year2000.com> Subject: Re: Confirmation Issues Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 06:05:34 -0500

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next