SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: alan miller who wrote (6443)3/7/1998 7:38:00 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (2) of 10836
 
>>>However, this is beginning to emerge as a clearly staged effort to cover a position taken at US5.00 at an unacceptable risk level. <<<

This is only a dream of the longs. This is a standard argument that is presented on just about every Asensio related thread, and is exactly on schedule. Check the ERGB and ZONA threads if you don't believe me. The folks at ERGB even went so far as to claim that Asensio had covered. The stock's price was between 10 and 14 at the time. ERGB closed yesterday at 4 11/16. I'd be willing to bet money that Asensio's cost basis is well over 5, were there anyway to prove it.

You guys can get all wrapped up in these crazy theories, and stroke each other until you believe them. It really won't matter in the end.

Many here speak of doing due diligence, what is so hard about going to previous Asensio related threads and seeing how the longs reacted there? You can skip the WDRY thread, there are nothing but short sellers there. But I think you'll be shocked at how similar the arguments against Asensio are, compared to this thread. I know I'm shocked how the same stuff happens over and over. I guess it's just hard to admit that you're wrong about a company, and these are the defense mechanisms.

Like I said, Asensio is due for a bad call. It's about the only real thing that the longs can hang their hat on, as far as I can see.

Barb
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext