"The Street.com really blew it this time, spreading FUD when no FUD is present. "
okay, i gotta ask... what is FUD, mang? something i should already know, no doubt.
"The street.com said Thursday :
""It's not a reflection of their business going forward," says one analyst
with a buy on the stock who requested anonymity. But such bullishness may
not last. Many Street watchers worry that 3Com has severely harmed its
credibility with the cloudy accounting."
mang, do you maintain that the above quote from the article is wrong? if you do (and i think that is your point) i disagree. the statement "many street watchers worry...etc." is accurate, imo. nothing is said about justifiably so, right?
perhaps i should just ask of you, mang, where in this excerpt do you think that thestreet.com "blew it this time"?
maybe i'm getting it wrong, i don't know.
regards,
mr.mark |
