SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mama Bear who wrote (6539)3/8/1998 9:30:00 PM
From: Gary Nash  Read Replies (1) of 10836
 
Barb: You are still reasoning by ANOLOGY; ie. you assume that since you have done well in the past from As.'s calls, he must be right this time as well. Now assuming that you are an intelligent person, you would have certainly read the three rulings presented to you by others here who do their DD. You cannot deny that Mael has title to LC 4&6; the present PAC ruling will deal with the illegal granting to PDG of a work contract to mine Mael's property. These are the facts Barb! What is it that you do not understand? These facts have clearly shown that As. has distorted the truth; in fact, many of his so called DD conclusions were word for word from Minca/PDG submission before the 1991 court case that was ruled in Mael's favour.
Gary.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News