Crystallex (KRY) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Fulvio Castelli who wrote (6528)	3/8/1998 11:37:00 PM
From: shorty	Read Replies (1) of 10836

Nicely said Fulvio. Last two times I spelled your name wrong were an honest mistake. Now with KRY investing in Mael the property has again changed hands, to the tune of 13.7 million unaccounted for dollars. Does this transfer have to be approved by MEM ? And if so back to 1986, this is when KRY invested in MAEL ? See I'm learning. The first transfer then is valid simply because Supreme court has forced MEM to Gazzete ? Because if the transfer to KRY has not been Gazzeted then PDG'S claim does have validity. Or am I missing something here ?(other than a few million brain cells). I also have a tendancy to beleive the posted rulings simply for lack of posted rulings to the contrary. I think that I may finish covering tommorow simply because I don't know. But am willing to wager that Ven Gov finds a hole somewhere and forces a resolution on this. Creating a partnership that will get things rolling. Allowing all parties to save face (Ven Gov included). PDG does have 60 mil invested and has been there for a while. I can't quite figure out why Chrystallex was willing to settle if things are as cut and dry as they appear ? And so to all a good Night. Scott

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next