SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Radica Games (RADA)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: David who wrote (3389)3/9/1998 11:12:00 AM
From: Sigmund  Read Replies (2) of 7111
 
David.

This approach might be the best given the circumstances but it can hardly be described as "efficient". Or if "efficient" it is certainly not the most "effective" inventory replenishment strategy ever devised.

Presumably you gain manufacturing cost savings this way. But the penalty in terms of inventory in the pipeline, potential for obsolete merchandise, time to market and most importantly these days stockouts is very high.

A very good inventory control system might ameliorate some of the problems. For example if you knew who was short and who was long re each sku you might be able to divert some shipments to where they were most needed. It might require some agreement from your customers but they would as a group benefit from this approach.

I gather that there is a large cost to you to move the stuff through warehouses but again they may need to play a larger role.

Of course if you are manufacturing limited it probably doesn't matter since you can't sell what you haven't manufactured. But that situation will not last forever as I understand you are increasing capacity.

Have you ever thought about doing some manufacturing closer to your markets?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext