SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : WARNING- have you been warned by SI? Let's talk

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jon Tara who wrote (304)3/9/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: Pugs  Read Replies (2) of 1614
 
Not only should they require real names and EMail addresses....they should have threads where SHAREHOLDERS can discuss the merit of their investment.
The RMIL thread has been completely taken over by a group of shareshakers which have been slamming a non-trading BB stock relentlessly, day-in & day-out for months. The company is a shell for a larger private co. to be publically traded and has recieved a $10MM cash infusion from a forign investor and will begin trading with an estimated naked, undeclared short position of 5-6MM shares. It appears every shortselling MM has hired the services of these same cretins that go from thread to thread of stocks with large short positions or possible squeezes to shake shares on the behalf of shortsellers. They slander and lie about the shareholders who defend their position in the co. and the standard claim that any shareholder of the company they are attempting to tank speaks of the 'merit' of their investment, they are , of course, hypsters, promoters and privy to insider information.
Also on the RMIL thread you'll find a character who promoted another stock on the internet and a newsletter he put out WITHOUT telling investors that he was a limited partner of the company!!!
Trading was halted, and the SEC dragged this promoter in for interrogation.
I posted this on the RMIL thread, to demonstrate the kind of person who was slamming my investment, I reproduced posts demonstrating his SEC woes , connections to the company, etc....
I was warned by S.I. NOT TO REPRODUCE THESE POSTS!! This same person continues his claims that I, my fellow shareholders, are privy to INSIDER information because we created an EMail thread to discuss our investment free of these shareshakers!!
These same shareshakers follow us from thread to thread and attempt to tank aNy investment we are involved in! We have abandoned those threads too, checke out the TVSI thread as an example!!
I wonder why these cretins are allowed such freedom to attack investors as well as their investments with such seemingly liberal freedom, when we defend ourselves, we get warned to straighten up!
I know S.I. administration has many folks to monitor and respect that, but it does seem these shareshakers are free to do their dirty work but we must bite our lips and persevere!!

Thanks for letting me vent!!
Pugs
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext