|
Just some observations gleaned from lurking: Flightless, I wouldn't bother responding to Carl. He exhibits the strikingly clear difference between the longs (you, Fulvio, Avalon etc.) and the shorts (Viper, Barbara Payne, Mic, Nord), that is so obvious to anyone who reads this thread. I admit I'm long on KRY and extremely confident in the DD here and on SH, as well as my own. But the interesting thing about the debate on the threads is that the shorts rarely if ever have anything substantive to say. It is always personal attacks, innuendo, fear mongering, outright lying (Asensio), or in Carl's case an uncanny ability to balance on the fence. They rehash old arguments that have been convincingly countered too many times to count. In contrast, the longs have exhausted every angle, know the story backwards and forwards, and provide detailed factual reasons for their beliefs. This all adds up to a scary finish for the misled shorts and their "guru" Assholio Banderas. (I'd rather tap the Maharishi for stock tips, and we all know how that one turned out for John, Paul, George and Ringo) |
