<It seems like all the lurkers who contribute nothing but commentary
enjoy Judith's posts. But, some of the long-timers who contribute
real info all of the time, happen to agree with me.>
You make me laugh, Doug. What are you the self-appointed, spokesperson for the content police? Funny Doug how I haven't seen you chastising the "long-timers" about chile, cigars and wine. You should be all over these guys for lack of "real info", right? (To others: Don't get me wrong, I like these posts and have made the chile several times).
Though I will be the first to thank RB, Seth, Vic, Jack and many others for their hard work and valued contributions here, I don't recognize this board as anyones private club. No posters here have special privileges other than those that go with the special respect earned by the aforementioned people. You have no say what-so-ever in what responsible posters such as Judith say here.
>Now, with saying all of that, if these comments by Judith were
intended to provoke some dialogue, maybe they are useful. However,
I tend to think that they weren't. Even if they were, why not pick
up the phone and get these questions answered yourself and turn it
into a fact-giving post instead of expecting someone else to do the work?>
Do you qualify your last post as "thought provoking" or do your posting rules only apply to others? If you are going to make rules then you should follow them yourself and consistently hammer every off topic poster on this thread -- which I am sure you won't. I think Judith was looking for some reassurance, not necessarily more DD. Is that somehow off limits on this thread? I'd like to think it isn't.
>Please don't respond to this. Use e-mail, if you feel the need to
repond.>
If you don't want a PUBLIC response why didn't YOU continue this discussion through e-mail rather than posting the last PUBLIC shot. Nice try but no chile for you.
Regards,
Jim |
