SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 228.68+1.2%Nov 17 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: marc henschke who wrote (17508)3/11/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: Big Bucks  Read Replies (4) of 70976
 
Marc,
When I made my $40 high projection for year end '99 it was with
the caveat that the stock would split prior to year end.
The implications of that are the stock would achieve $80+ as
a high for the year, but by year end, after the split and the
typical round of profit taking the $ price would be $40 (split
adjusted).<VBG> I was wondering if anyone understood that when
I origionally posted my "prediction". I think if GM or someone
would care to locate that origional post it affirms what I
stated at that time.
As for the titanic/iceberg analogies, I like to inject some
"color" into my posts the thread to break up the monotony and
once in a while I try my hand at an attempt at humor, sometimes
maybe not to successfully.<g> Anyone who has read my posts for a
while understands that I use analogies, a lot, to allow folks a
different perspective to think about. Seems like I do reference
waves/surfing, cards/poker, Storms/weather, ships and icebergs,
and guns/powder a lot. Maybe I'm just trying to reference everyday
comparisons, or maybe I'm just weird! <VBG>

Still waiting patiently,
Studly<VBG>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext