I believe that if we are not free to discuss the Ark of the Covenant, and that we cannot have great and incredible interest in it from about 100 standpoints, then truly our Christianity has driven some of us quite mad.
That's my only take on it. As for me, I will discuss the Ark of the Covenant with anyone and everyone, and come one day to understand why it is presented in Rev. 11, or wherever you saw it.
Nancy, we are dealing here with things the leading theologians of all time have not clearly explained to my satisfaction, if even explained it, period. Gregor posted something the other day about an old testament burning of thingz and I need to print it out because I'm going to study it, because I realize something amazing is there.
We need time to digest these things to offer an answer, and the reason we have no answer to the Ark question in Rev. is that it takes a lot of time to begin to find out what God is showing us in that portion of Rev.
I'm still trying to digest Gregor's last three posts, and do not take them lightly. So, please don't think no response means no interest. To glibly shoot off about that is to me serious error also. I think there has been enough shooting wildly from the hip regarding the high things of Jesus Christ and the Old Testament history of His Father that maybe no more sudden explanations just to offer an explanation is GREAT.
I appreciate your addressing your thoughts to us again, as after all, if this is not what Jesus Christ is all about, what in the world are we all doing talking about Him? |
