Naxos Resources (NAXOF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mark silvers who wrote (9928)	3/13/1998 11:40:00 AM
From: JBerech3	Read Replies (1) of 20681

I have a question that I don't think has been asked yet. Perhaps Kim can respond. Yesterday's release for #5 at 250-275' shows 2.435 but is discounted as unreliable due to sample size. How does this sample size compare to the samples from the same hole listed in the Jan 12th news release? Hopefully those samples were sufficiently large enough to allow legitimate estimate calculations. ALso, there seems to be a lot of questions regarding the difference in the two sets of Certified numbers. What I'm reading is yesterdays release data is from Standard Lead Fire Assay with no Preprocessing with the J/L Methodology. ( I agree that one sentence mentioning Dr. Johnson is confusing at best , misleading at worst). However, isn't this the side by side comparison of Standard Assay to J/L method assay with multiple independent labs that was being asked for last year? Maybe I'm off base here but it seems to me that this is the release we've been waiting for to prove to the industry that yes there is gold in them thar hills(dirt). jb3

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next