SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DMaA who wrote (390)3/14/1998 1:54:00 AM
From: synchro  Read Replies (1) of 5853
 
<question: Should policy lead?>

Veep Gore missed the whole point. Government policy is designed by committee, where a concensus is thrashed out like sausage is made. "Important scientific advances" (or any other kind of creative thought or innovation) by definiton means a disagreement *by an individual*-- disagreement from the consensus, or an unique insight, or a deviation from conventional wisdom. Therefore "important scientific advances" necessarily leads "government policy"--sometimes by a generation.

What Mr. Gore doesn't understand is that there is really very little role for him as a government official in the scheme of capitalism and progress. If he regulates a little less, taxes a little less, scares a little less, he would already be doing us a tremendous favor.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext