SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : SYQUEST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RagTimeBand who wrote (5848)3/14/1998 5:58:00 PM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (1) of 7685
 
>>"Still, the Jaz 2GB's competitor, the SyQuest SyJet 1.5GB on our WinList, remains the better choice. Though offering smaller capacity (1.5GB), the SyJet copied files 5 percent faster on the same system, and its price difference per megabyte for media is a healthy 30 percent less.<<

Emory -

Without seeing the specifications of the system the drives were tested on, this is less than meaningful. Jaz2 has an Ultra SCSI interface, which allows synchronous burst transfer rates of up to 20 MB/sec. SyJet uses the older Fast SCSI interface, with a top burst rate of 10MB/sec.

If the test machine was not equipped with an Ultra SCSI controller, then it would not allow Jaz2 to attain its best performance. This is probably why reviews of various removable systems, including SyJet, Jaz and Jaz2, have produced differing test results. When mated with an Ultra SCSI controller, Jaz2 will be faster than SyJet, and tests have confirmed this.

Of course, the cost per megabyte comparison is still valid. But if cost per megabyte were my only concern, I wouldn't buy a SyJet, I'd get a SparQ.

- Allen
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext