SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rambi who wrote (18394)3/14/1998 7:33:00 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
Hi Penni, well it looks like we have something to disagree on huh? How wonderful. :-)

I must say, of all the ones to have answered the challenge yours makes the most valid points. But let me see if I can take them apart one by one. :-)

Your point is valid concerning the power relationship of Mother/ daughter and Father/Son. However it disapears when your talking about a brother sister or sister sister marrying. That leaves the correlation still intact.

Genetic dysfuctionality is a valid point, which Janice brought up earlier, however, we provide no sort of litmus test to couples who are predisposed to genetically dyfunctional children. We just accept the fact that if get married they will make the right decisions regarding giving birth. Also we are rapidly approaching a time when we may be able to alter the genetic code to ensure mutant genes are removed.

Would it then make it ok to get married to siblings?

Therefore, although it may confuse an already difficult issue it is a valid point and the correlation does exists.

Michael
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext