>Even if you are long on a stock you should constantly (speaking in relative terms) be
prepared to reevaluate your position.<
BlackStar, whose not doing this?
Pretty much everything has been said on the pro and con side. But you seem to be forgetting that there's a lot of 'em out there who want to kill the stock and drive it's price down. Do you admit this?
So what are others to do? Sit back and let 'em do it like that? Come on, you used to be so sensible in this forum.
Sure there may be prior financial problems concerning venture capitalism. But, have you ever stopped to think what kind of money and deals drive Big Oil or tobacco?
Let me be so far the only one to introduce a postive qualification to this man Hayton, whom I only know from negative reports: He at least had the foresight, whether successful or not, to be involved in an alternative energy project, an industry where our nation, as inventors, let go to Germany and Japan! This should at least stand for something.
I'm also bothered by the fact that you imply that if you do your DD, you will get out. BlackStar, a lot of us have done just that. And are in. There's nothing wrong with sitting on the sidelines, wanting or waiting to get in. But if you're going to attempt to inject balance, please don't do it with a subdued inference not to invest in NETZ now. Some may like to invest a little now, maybe more later. The question remains: Will the better price be today or tomorrow?
As I've informed Aleta, were it not for Lair, Meatchem and Burgess, I wouldn't be in this stock at all (I sold half my holdings on the bad news). Yes, an audited report will give more people a comfort level. But you still have to consider that, for some of us, the above-named executives already provide such a comfort level, particularly coupled with the emergant nature of the technology.
Critics please name those who you believe are blindly hyping. Perhaps they might have a response for you. Frankly, I see more stinkbombs thrown than any kind of rocket-hype.
Those of you in the middle, should be careful that when you commit to the dialogue, that you stay on your neutral ground. Otherwise you could well be hurting the innocent in this. |
