CH,
You want people to take your posts seriously while you post things like:
"I only said Mr. Witz's health might be OK right
now, (I was informed by a previous employee of Osicom and I have not confirmed Mr Witz's health status by myself because I have no way to do it)."
Why every one who has some thing "funny" to say about Osicom gets his information from "unnamed" "former employees"? And the information is always unconfirmed?
"so we can have chance to know the "fact" or get closer to the fact, some members here seem to have close contact with Par, why don't they ask him the fact and tell us here, if Mr Witz is recovered from his health"
If the status of BW's health is so crucial to your health, instead of spreading unsupported and unsubstantiated impressions about the company, why don't you simply pickup the phone call the company and ask the questions yourself.
"It looks suspicious to me that a major shareholder with 20% does not on the board, especially with a history of Barron's article."
Are you sure he owns 20% of Osicom shares. May be you should check this out. Off course unless spreading misinformation and negative impressions is your objective.
"do I have right to provide some of my findings to the new comers so that they will not copy my mistake?"
And you call this stuff "findings". This should tell you why it is so hard to take some one like you seriously. But this should not stop you, keep it up. Also, I am not going to ask you as to who is paying you for your "services".
Afaq Sarwar |
