Hi Marcos,
"Which means, imho, a decision that is not 100% in favor of PDG/CVG or 100% in favor of KRY/Mael, but somewhere in between. A decision that, the case being so murky and delicate and precedent-setting, the legislators decide to deal with, whether at the request of the Court or not."
My opinion is... if the court wanted to exercise the "political correctness" of which you speak, I think that they would have considered it and nipped this in the bud through the first 3 decisions. After all, these Supreme Court Justices aren't exactly mentally challenged and could see where this was going all along. They would have known that there would be much less "fallout" from a quicker rejection of Mael's claims.
Just my $.02,
Ray
P.S. Marcos, I have enjoyed your posts in the past and find them quite balanced- keep it up! |
