Crystallex (KRY) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Valentine who wrote (6897)	3/16/1998 2:40:00 PM
From: TAO	Read Replies (1) of 10836

Valentine If you read my post properly, you will see that I do not disagree with you with respect to what phase of this dispute we are at. I said "I will again reiterate that I have no personal knowledge as to whether this case will go to a hearing or not, but I suggest you read the following and consider the question to follow. I look forward to your interpretation:" I asked for you interpretation of the appeal, which BTW, I have confirmed. If the appeal is successful based on the merits of the argument, what more is there to decide on ? I apologize if I am missing something here but I see no reason for you not to logically and coherently explain your views on the appeal AND the phrasing of the question you supposedly put to Judge Acuna. Unless of course you do not have an explanation and cannot "walk your talk" so to speak. Further suggestions of GAME OVER without explanation simply serve to qualify the opinions of many here, including myself , who feel that you are simply here to stir the pot but do not have a good grip on the handle. One other thing if I may ask, how might your views change if Placer were to announce that their suspension of work was on a more permanent basis? :>)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next