BAY Ntwks (under House) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: RFF who wrote (4590)	3/16/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: Wizard Wannabe	Read Replies (1) of 6980

I performed a fundamental analysis over at eduvest.com using the following input assumptions: Shares outstanding 220 mil (10Q) Long Term Debt 99 mil (10Q) Book value $6.66 per share (Edgar Snapshot) Projected EPS (yearly) $1.58 (Zacks) Projected avg. growth in earnings 45% (Proj./current) Projected avg. growth in Sales 25% (Chat room talk) AAA Bond yield 6.81% Current Earnings $1.09 per shr (Zacks) Years earnings growth to be sustained 1 yr (conservative) Results: $72.12 per share, p/e 45.65 (a little high), Relative Risk: 1.86 (Fairly risky. With the model, you really want to be around the "1" mark) I posted the above results in the model's forum, so you can access, examine the input assumptions, and even make changes. I then decided to play a different scenario by changing the following: I changed Projected eps from 1.58 to 1.38 thus changing percentage of earnings growth from 45% to 30%. This should give me a more conservative result. Results: $45.17 as a value point, p/e 32.73, Relative Risk 1.34. Bottom line: Barring any negative surprises, bay appears considerably undervalued fundamentally speaking. wizzy

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next