Crystallex (KRY) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Valentine who wrote (6875)	3/16/1998 10:25:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) of 10836

A court action under Venezuelan law does not allow for partial admission of an action. If part of the action is not ruled on at the time it is immaterial if the CASE is admitted based on other points. So the CASE was admitted, is being heard and of COURSE the 3 points specifically pointed out were to be adjudicated for admission of hearing by a higher court, WILL be considered. It is like a trial court hearing whether evidence will be allowed to be heard by the Jury, it must be in the court, and not necessarily in the indictment. In this case it may be assumed, that due the delay in obtaining hearings and publishment of ownership, and the NECESSITY of this case in enforcing ownership because of abrogated rights and political delays, that the statute of limitations will not apply here. The important thing to remember here is that this case is FINAL. The Supreme Court cannot be appealed. It WILL deny PDG their right to mine. It is important to consider too that CVG is rapidly losing parallel cases of equal importance in court where it has been shown that they were improperly constitutionally formed, as it has been seen Dome was aware of all along. echarter@vianet.on.ca The Canadian Mining Newsletter

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next