Frankly Jeff, I am not sure...my inclination would be to shop around for a few lawyers in an inquiring sort of mode, saying, these are the facts as we know them, including the famous disavowal of Mr. Walther on Friday. We ask, based on the experience of the prospective employee, whether he feels a case is justifiable, would he be prepared to work on the project, and what remuneration would be acceptable, assuming a class-action is acceptable to the many victims on this thread. And let there be no doubts, we have been victimized. All of this assumes the best interest of shareholders is the overriding concern. To my mind, any legal advice on this matter is of paramount importance. This is a legal matter, like it or not, and people should try and ascertain their rights. If nothing else, it will give people a better understanding of what they're up against.
My suspicion is that people out there who should have known better, may have opened themselves up to a lawsuit...was it one man and one woman only, or a more onerous operation involving bigger money? What must be construed as informed selling was taking place, in my opinion. Who told who what? What about telephone records, SEC??
I presume the SEC will issue a bland statement tomorrow. |
