SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Pierre J. LeBel who wrote (1024)3/17/1998 11:58:00 AM
From: T Lamos  Read Replies (2) of 8117
 
Congrats Pierre

On cashing out of PYNG and taking a handsome profit. And a hearty "thanks" for freeing up more shares for me & others who continue to accumulate at these bargain levels. It's too bad you fail to appreciate how undervalued these shares continue to be at the $6+ level. Perhaps it was your shares I bought this morning.

Allow me to respond to Pierre's suggestion these shares are "grossly overvalued" - a rather strong statement. For those who may now be considering an initial or further investment in this company at this price share level, I suggest there remains plenty of room for profit in the near, mid and long term. Do your due diligence, buy in and you will be rewarded handsomely. Research the company's news releases and company/product info, sort through the wheat and chaff on this thread - there are many sound and fundamentally-based analyses to choose from - and in the end you'll slap yourself for not getting in earlier.

Pierre: On what fundamental reasons do you base your price valuations? Mine are based primarily on analyses submitted by hard-working folks such as Kevin Garnier (https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=3719900)
combined with the stream of good news disseminated of late which is summarized for the most part in
Message 3716909
(also have a gander at the March 13 & 16 news releases.)

To all I would suggest it's in the best interest of the company and investor base to always support any and all stock price predictions with a reasonable amount of supporting analyses, as much as possible. Without providing sound reasoning to backup your conclusions, a posting assumes the characteristics of hype rather providing facts which investors need to base the investment decisions on. Isn't that the primary reason why this thread was established?

Hopefully I'm not too out of line having stated by beliefs being a relative newbie on this thread, but it just had to be said. Once again, just one man's opinion.

Tom
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext