Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 153.03

-1.0%

Jan 27 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Asterisk who wrote (9271)	3/17/1998 11:52:00 PM
From: rhet0ric	Read Replies (2) of 152472

What I mean is that it doesn't matter that both TDMA and CDMA work, they odviously do. The deeper and more important question (that I believe the pup was looking at) was which is cheaper and possibly better in the long run for operators to use? Does "pup" refer to me? Is this another thread-specific canine reference, or am I missing something? I was actually asking the former, i.e. does CDMA have a distinct advantage because of a similarity between code division and TCP/IP packets. So my question was answered. You're right, though, that the larger question of which is faster/more reliable/cheaper is more important (especially since my question turned out to be moot). I also had another motive, and that was to swing some of the conversation to something besides telephony. Maybe it's because I'm immersed in Web work, but I see Qualcomm as a diversified communications company with an eye on the big picture. This Korea thing is just a blip. If Qualcomm executes well, they could dominate mobile Internet messaging. Does anyone else think this is important? rhet0ric

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next