Royal Oak-RYO Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Royal Oak-RYO

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: littleguy who wrote (746)	3/18/1998 1:51:00 AM
From: Michael Bidder	Read Replies (2) of 1706

What reasons can you give to support your assertion that Kemess be cash positive. Please don't quote Royal Oaks numbers. Stick to the basics : Rock mechanics Striping ratios Crushing Throughput Metallurgy Milling Concentration Seperation Flotation I am unfamiliar with these processes but I understand that to make the argument that Kemess is economic would require them. If you provide an answer I will endeavor to debate it. My reasons against are: A) Low Grade B) Low Commodity prices C) Rock Hardness D) Used equipment Thankyou in advance for your consideration of the issue. -Respectfully littleguy, Michael Bidder

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next