SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Loral Space & Communications

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Geoff who wrote (2245)3/18/1998 1:58:00 AM
From: Beefeater  Read Replies (5) of 10852
 
Geoff, here's a response to Readware's "asteroid implosion on Jupiter" comments, which merited a sharp rebuttal from an amateur astronomer who goes by the name "Mason." Post this to Readware on AOL if you like, but it needs an airing here.

Re: Readware's 3/15/98 comment on "Meteor Shower".

First of all, the "asteroid implosion" Readware describes as having taken place last year was nothing of the sort. It was a comet impact, and it took place in 1994. An "asteroid implosion" would involve a non-cometary body collapsing in upon itself. Nothing of the sort has ever been known to occur.

As to Readware's comment that "that asteroid implosion has completely changed the gravitational oscillation/pull of Jupiter on other orbits" is complete rubbish. The comet - not asteroid - which impacted Jupiter in 1994 (it was known as comet Shoemaker/Levy, after Eugene Shoemaker - may he Rest In Peace - and David Levy, the co-discoverers), not 1997, was of such miniscule mass compared to the planet Jupiter, that any perturbation of any body remotely within the gravitational sphere of influence of the planet would be undetectable.

I am surprised that Readware, whose posts regarding the satellite business are so erudite, could be capable of posting such vapid speculations on the celestial mechanics of cometary impacts. This stuff isn't even close to accurate. I am moved by this speculative
disinformation to question, now, other Readware pontifications. Really. This isn't worthy of the National Enquirer.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext