SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Goalie who wrote (733)	3/18/1998 3:41:00 AM
From: POLARBEAR	Read Replies (3) of 7235

gold-eagle.com Hi Goalie, Just finished writing an article on Randgold, in which I have a section on the M-1. Old news here for most, but thought you might want to take a look. Also, maybe there will be a few SUF buyers from the article. From all that I've gathered reading about the lawsuit, doesn't seem that the "heirs" including Mr. Lawyer, have much to stand on, thus I didn't include it in my article. RANDGOLD will do well without the M-1, just as SUF will, but seems like they'll both prosper more after being awarded the disputed property.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next