SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom Frederick who wrote (10486)3/18/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: W.F. Schwertley  Read Replies (2) of 20681
 
To All (hold on to your hat, Jerard),

The following is a combination of the assay samples of the
last two press releases (*** indicates today's results):

Hole Depth Ledoux & Rocky Mountain
Company Geochemical
(Au oz/T) (Au oz/T)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
4 25'-50' 0.134
4 25'-50' 0.222
4 150'-175' 0.120
4 150'-175' 0.181
5 25'-50' excluding 30'-35' 0.082 0.024
5 50'-75' excluding 60'-65' 0.079
5 50'-75' excluding 60'-65' 0.105
5 50'-75' excluding 60'-65' 0.146
5 50'-75' excluding 60'-65' 0.227
5 75'-100' 0.024
5 75'-100' 0.198 ***
0.198 ***
5 125'-150' 0.012
5 125'-150' 0.201 ***
excluding 130'-135' 0.222 ***
5 150'-175' excluding 160'-165' 0.082 0.108
5 205'-225' 0.096
5 205'-225' 0.163 ***
0.187 ***
5 225'-250' 0.068
5 225'-250' 0.213 ***
0.236 ***
5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.093
5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.102
5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.155
5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.180
5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.190
5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.260
5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.327
5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 2.435(a)
5 275'-300' 0.067 0.032
5 275'-300' Johnson 0.566 ***
0.306 ***
5 305'-330' 0.040
5 305'-330' Johnson 0.251 ***
0.146 ***
5 305'-330' 0.070 0.060

Now, if the Johnson/Lett Method was used on the assays in last
week's PR (as I believe) why are the assay results less then
today's PR which did not use the Method for most of the samples?
And even if the Johnson/Lett Method was not used on last week's,
why are last's week's assays so much smaller than today's?
Finally, why weren't these assay samples duplicated by RMG?

Don't get me wrong, I thought today's PR was a few standards
above last week's. But I still have questions I would like
answered.

Long with a sell hair trigger,
WFS
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News